Attention: this is very old content, revived mostly for historical interest.
Many of the pages on this site
are still useful, but please bear in mind that they may be out of date. (Especially, do not try to use contact information, phone numbers, etc.
found on these pages unless you couldn't find anything more recent.)
See here for more information.
YES: I THINK private property should not be expropriated for treaty settlements! | 41 | |
NO: I DON'T THINK private property should not (Boolean: two no's, two nots, or a no and a not, is a yes) be expropriated for treaty settlements! | 14 | |
There's nothing wrong with the question. It's perfectly clear. 'Yes' means it should be, 'No' means it shouldn't be. | 7 | |
There's nothing wrong with the question. It's perfectly clear. 'Yes' means it shouldn't be, 'No' means it should be. | 15 | |
69 Votes Total |